Skip to main content

The collaborative process 4.7.4

Collaboration on an online project like developing a wiki is fun if everyone is collaborating. It becomes challenging if you have to work with a team that either is reluctant taking up their responsibilities in the group or probably, for one reason or the the other, do not at all contribute to the group collaboration. 

In the last experience I had with group collaboration task, the experience was not so good; although it made me learn a lot in the process. For starters, only three members of the five were taking part actively. Of the three, two continued to the end and of the two one seemed not very conversant with what exactly was supposed to be done. The one left did something which, at this juncture, I must condemn! Not reading what the rest of the members had come up with, the said person decided to delete all the work two of us had come up with; the research write up and links were all deleted and substituted with what the person saw fitting. Good enough, it seemed to be relevant to what was needed. I later had to work within what was submitted making adjustments here and there although I was not in agreement with this move because the rest of the group members' work was not appreciated. We were working on a wiki page.
In all I learnt that:

  • It is important that all members communicate and set clear goals, objectives and tasks knowing who does what and when.
  • Ground rules which ensure work is done in time and respect for one another's work and opinions should be set.
  • All members should be familiar with the platform the collaboration work is going to work with
  • A contingency plan in the event that one or more of the members is not delivering needs to be in place
I was particularly drawn by a resource that guided teachers on how to handle cyber bullying (the link is on the wiki we built) and another which had almost everything about cyber bullying

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My links for 4.6.3

Hello Group! I have tried to comb through the internet for websites that will provide support in determining the best digital literacies education strategy for a school. Kindly look through and share with me your opinions. http://www.teachthought.com/technology/63-things-every-student-should-know-in-a-digital-world/ http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/digital-literacy-skills/ http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/digital-literacy-across-curriculum-handbook http://classroom-aid.com/educational-resources/digital-literacy/ http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/10/29/ctq_crowley_digitalliteracy.html http://rpsconnected.rbe.sk.ca/2013/04/no-lights-no-camera-but-lots-of-action.html https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/curriculum http://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/Waving-Silently-Technology-and-Self-Harm http://www.digital-literacy.org.uk/Home.aspx https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002144/214485e.pdf

MY REVIEW OF TWO LESSONS THAT INFUSE DIGITAL LITERACY 4.3.3

LESSON A Click here to view This is a Geography lesson entitled "Our Fractured Earth" . In the lesson, the learners work in groups and generally do their research and presentations on a media of their choice. The learners use mainly power point slides they prepare themselves as opposed to those prepared by the teacher. This clearly indicates how the lesson goes a long way in engaging learners to create meaningful content as they collaborate in their groups. This knowledge is later shared. Digital methodologies and pedagogies are seen in the teacher allowing learners to use any gadgets they are permitted by their parents to use. The learners also go ahead to solve real problems when one of the groups creates a Lego motion animation representing what it might be like to be in an earthquake. The objectives in the lessons are clearly stipulated and show that digital literacy is infused. For instance, one of the objectives says that the learners will explore, analyse and evalua

Why analysing your learners may be very important. 3.6.4

There has been a heated debate in our group discussion on the importance of certain elements of analysis of students in the ASSURE lesson planning model. These are ethnic background (to what extent should we analyse these students background? By country of origin, tribe, skin colour or others?), What learning styles need to be considered in what kind of lessons? and How do this analyses auger with the use of technology? I strongly agree that analysis of students is important and MUST be done if proper planing for individual needs in a classroom is to be successful. However, only those criteria which may affect the teaching learning process should be considered. For instance, if you are going to handle a lesson on piggery in agriculture, you must consider religious affiliation as an issue otherwise some denominations may have a problem at the end of the day. The same would definitely not be true if you are handling "law of diminishing returns" in the same subject. Some