Skip to main content

CLASSROOM WALLS



Breaking the traditional classroom wall is like tearing down a large building. It requires proper planning, high will power, a passion to see them down and yes; the right alternative technological tools to do the job. Technology has proven to be literally limitless when it comes to facilitating the teaching learning process both in and out of the classroom setting and is the only alternative to this long enduring model – traditional four walled classrooms.

The traditional four walled classroom model portrays itself in a number of ‘glorified’ ways but still maintains a somewhat common paradigm that learning – despite the use of technology – should take place within four walls of the classroom. Use of technology is more of a separate activity with little or no relevance to the usual ‘very important’ lessons within the allocated and fixed lesson periods. All learning that takes place outside our traditional classroom walls (in this paradigm) is considered to be accidental and not deliberate.

I disagree strongly to the above tradition. By appropriately using the right technology tools to support the teaching learning process and applying ourselves to well-planned and facilitated learning, technology can do wonders in breaking the traditional four walls of our classrooms. In this application, technology should be seen as a mechanism that can ensure that learning takes place anywhere and everywhere; appealing to the learners’ interests and convenience and providing for self-paced learning among others.


The world, as we know it, becomes a small global village and learners can collect, create and share knowledge in an unlimited number of ways. The use of technology in the context of bringing down our traditional classroom walls can only be limited by a teacher’s creativity and a learner’s intuition and imagination.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My links for 4.6.3

Hello Group! I have tried to comb through the internet for websites that will provide support in determining the best digital literacies education strategy for a school. Kindly look through and share with me your opinions. http://www.teachthought.com/technology/63-things-every-student-should-know-in-a-digital-world/ http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/digital-literacy-skills/ http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/digital-literacy-across-curriculum-handbook http://classroom-aid.com/educational-resources/digital-literacy/ http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/10/29/ctq_crowley_digitalliteracy.html http://rpsconnected.rbe.sk.ca/2013/04/no-lights-no-camera-but-lots-of-action.html https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/curriculum http://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/Waving-Silently-Technology-and-Self-Harm http://www.digital-literacy.org.uk/Home.aspx https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002144/214485e.pdf

MY REVIEW OF TWO LESSONS THAT INFUSE DIGITAL LITERACY 4.3.3

LESSON A Click here to view This is a Geography lesson entitled "Our Fractured Earth" . In the lesson, the learners work in groups and generally do their research and presentations on a media of their choice. The learners use mainly power point slides they prepare themselves as opposed to those prepared by the teacher. This clearly indicates how the lesson goes a long way in engaging learners to create meaningful content as they collaborate in their groups. This knowledge is later shared. Digital methodologies and pedagogies are seen in the teacher allowing learners to use any gadgets they are permitted by their parents to use. The learners also go ahead to solve real problems when one of the groups creates a Lego motion animation representing what it might be like to be in an earthquake. The objectives in the lessons are clearly stipulated and show that digital literacy is infused. For instance, one of the objectives says that the learners will explore, analyse and evalua

Why analysing your learners may be very important. 3.6.4

There has been a heated debate in our group discussion on the importance of certain elements of analysis of students in the ASSURE lesson planning model. These are ethnic background (to what extent should we analyse these students background? By country of origin, tribe, skin colour or others?), What learning styles need to be considered in what kind of lessons? and How do this analyses auger with the use of technology? I strongly agree that analysis of students is important and MUST be done if proper planing for individual needs in a classroom is to be successful. However, only those criteria which may affect the teaching learning process should be considered. For instance, if you are going to handle a lesson on piggery in agriculture, you must consider religious affiliation as an issue otherwise some denominations may have a problem at the end of the day. The same would definitely not be true if you are handling "law of diminishing returns" in the same subject. Some